<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Riding the Blog Flume</title>
	<atom:link href="http://andrew.stannard.name/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://andrew.stannard.name/blog</link>
	<description>Like a Rollercoaster, but with water.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 10:50:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Web 2.0 defined by Riding the Blog Flume &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Web 2.0 - A test for the Geek</title>
		<link>http://andrew.stannard.name/blog/2006/10/04/web-20-defined/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Riding the Blog Flume &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Web 2.0 - A test for the Geek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 10:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrew.stannard.name/blog/?p=9#comment-2</guid>
		<description>[...] Now that I feel I am getting a grasp of Web 2.0 I must consolodate my understanding.? So far I have discovered that a specific colour scheme is required.? Additionally, in testing my Web 2.0 knowledge, I realise that a silly name is also a constituent part of Web 2.0. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Now that I feel I am getting a grasp of Web 2.0 I must consolodate my understanding.? So far I have discovered that a specific colour scheme is required.? Additionally, in testing my Web 2.0 knowledge, I realise that a silly name is also a constituent part of Web 2.0. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
